Friday, January 4, 2013

Looking Into the Mystique of Notre Dame Football

Excellence transcends the football field for the famous Fighting Irish, and this commitment to quality incorporates a strong component of Catholic faith.


1/04/2013
University of Notre Dame
A statue of the Blessed Mother stands atop the golden dome of the Main Building.
– University of Notre Dame
National Catholic Register
SOUTH BEND, Ind. — The University of Notre Dame is second to none when it comes to rich football tradition.
This is made clear by glancing at the records of just three of the school’s coaches, the legendary Knute Rockne, Frank Leahy and Ara Parseghian. They have a combined 287 wins, 40 losses and 18 ties at Notre Dame (an .857 winning percentage), along with nine national championships.
And it will add another title in 2013, if this year’s unbeaten Fighting Irish squad can overcome the powerhouse University of Alabama team in the Jan. 7 BCS Championship Game in Miami.
Notre Dame’s excellence doesn’t end on the football field, however. In fact, its football team’s athletic achievements may even pale in comparison with its academic ones. Since 1962, Notre Dame has graduated an amazing 98.74% of its football players in four years, the highest mark in the nation.
Holy Cross Father Willy Raymond said this has not happened accidentally, but by design.
“Notre Dame has a long history of high academic standards,” said Father Raymond. “The school was established in 1842, and the football program only came along 45 years later, in 1887. There are plenty of other sporting teams and, of course, plenty of academic disciplines that most people are not familiar with. Yet football is the most common way the average person knows about the school. That’s the entry point, but there is so much more beyond it.”
Father Raymond related how head football coach Frank Leahy put together a successful program in the 1940s and 1950s, but at a price, according to some administrators.
“Frank Leahy was a great coach,” Father Raymond acknowledged. “His teams won plenty of games and four national championships. However, there was a feeling among the school’s administration that he was independent of them. They wanted him to realize he was part of the university and that football came after academic and spiritual pursuits.”
Continued Father Raymond, “Father Theodore Hesburgh, who was the university’s president from 1952 to 1987, set out to put football in its rightful place. This brought about enough tension for Coach Leahy to resign in January of 1954, even though he had two years left on his contract.
“The two men had their differences, but would eventually reconcile before Leahy’s death, in 1973. Father Hesburgh was even present with Coach Leahy during the last two days of his life.”

The Ara Parseghian Era
Some thought after Leahy’s departure from Notre Dame in 1954 that the football program itself had seen its last days of success. “The emphasis on academics would not allow Notre Dame to recruit the top athletes, they thought,” Father Raymond explained. “The football team didn’t do too well for a decade after Leahy left, but that turned around with the hiring of Ara Parseghian in 1964.
“During his tenure, the program posted a record of 95 wins, 17 losses and four ties, with no loosening of academic standards. The belief that you can’t have both top students and top athletes was proven false.”
Parseghian was thoroughly aware of the importance of recruiting young men who were skilled both physically and mentally.
“The coaching staff knew that Notre Dame was first and foremost an institution of higher learning,” the 89-year-old Parseghian told the Register. “The central purpose of attending the school was to become educated in a specific discipline. Football was strictly secondary. Contrary to what some might think, this really did help us. Players like Joe Montana were great not from a sheer physical standpoint, but primarily because of their minds.”
When a player’s mind was not on academics, he was certain to hear about it from the coaches.
“If someone didn’t attend class, we were all over him,” Parseghian noted. “There was no tolerance for taking schoolwork lightly. Most of the time, this wasn’t an issue, though. When you have rigorous entry requirements to begin with, chances are very good that you’ll do well once you’re attending the school. The pre-entry screening process was very helpful.”
Something else that proved helpful for Parseghian’s teams was spending the night before home games at Moreau Seminary, located on the other side of St. Joseph’s Lake on campus.
“The first year I was at Notre Dame, 1964, we found that the seminary was spacious enough to house the football team, in addition to the seminarians who were already living there,” he recalled. “I was pleased with this, because the atmosphere of the seminary was so tranquil. It was very conducive to getting a good night‘s rest.”
The next morning, the entire team, Catholics and non-Catholics alike, would attend Mass and receive a blessing from a Holy Cross priest. Blessed medals were handed out to players and coaches as well.
Parseghian, who is not Catholic, appreciated this spiritual component to Notre Dame football: “There was always an underlying spirituality to whatever happened at Notre Dame. That was one of the main reasons I enjoyed being there so much.”
Parseghian chose to stay in South Bend despite offers to coach in professional football. He found the area to be a great fit, especially considering his children’s ages at the time. “It was perfect for my family. The spirituality, the smaller town, the dedication to learning — it all came together so well. It was better to be there than to have gone to a larger city, which would have been necessary if I had accepted a position in pro football.”
Summed up Parseghian, “I appreciate my years at Notre Dame, not just from a professional standpoint, but from a family one as well.”

A Player’s Perspective
Anthony Brannan, a linebacker at Notre Dame from 1996 to 2000, also has a great appreciation for his experience in South Bend. The dedication to academic and athletic excellence impressed him, but most impressive was the spirituality encompassing his collegiate years.
“The academic standards at Notre Dame were very high, from gaining admission to attending classes to actually graduating,” Brannan remembered. “On the recruiting trip, you’re likely to talk with more advisers than coaches, and once you’re in school, the coaches made sure you attended classes. I recall seeing assistant coaches at classroom doors to make sure we players were there. It wasn’t just support staff, but the coaches themselves who were present.”
It was clear to Brannan that playing football came second to earning a degree. However, excelling at football was also expected, a reality he enjoyed. “In my first year on the squad, I had the opportunity to play for Lou Holtz, who was upbeat, energetic and goal-oriented. He was very much into the game and wanted to get the best performances out of his players.”
Brannan remembered that Holtz’s perspective didn’t end on the football field: “He took it all into context. Before games, he would say, ‘Gentlemen, remember who you’re playing for: Our Lady on the Golden Dome (there was a large statue of the Blessed Virgin atop the Main Building on campus) and Our Lord.’ That was just one example of how spirituality was to be found nearly everywhere on campus or at university-related events.”

Impressed by Knute Rockne
Holy Cross Father Paul Doyle will be among those hoping the Fighting Irish do well against the University of Alabama Crimson Tide for the national title. Father Doyle is the home-game chaplain for the team, which is appropriate, considering how he learned of the university in the first place.
“My father was attending Mount St. Mary’s in Emmetsburg, Md., in the 1920s,” Father Doyle explained. “At the time, Knute Rockne was doing a fine job of coaching at Notre Dame, which brought a lot of attention to the school. That impressed my father, and he was determined that his future children would attend Notre Dame. My three brothers and I ended up doing just that.
“I was also ordained a Holy Cross father and spent my first nine years in parish ministry. Then I returned to campus and have been here ever since.” In fact, Father Doyle doesn’t even leave campus for road games; he lets another priest take care of the team away from home.
On campus at the Basilica of the Sacred Heart, Father Doyle offers Mass the morning of home games, with all the players and coaching staff present. At the end of Mass, the Litany of the Blessed Virgin Mary is prayed, a relic of the true cross is venerated, and team members receive a blessed medal of a saint.
“The traditions surrounding Notre Dame football have largely remained unchanged,” Father Doyle said. “We’ve had Mass for the team on game days since the 1920s at least, and the medals have been a part of it for as long as I can remember. We give inexpensive oxidized medals of a different saint to the players and coaches before every game, along with a short catechesis on the saint. We explain why that particular witness of God is relevant to them today.”
Father Doyle said he tries not to repeat a saint within a four-year cycle, so everyone will have a new medal to add to his collection each week. While this year’s squad is just under 50% Catholic, players and coaches tend to cherish the medals, regardless of their religious affiliation.

Broader Perspective
In the locker room just before the game, Father Doyle leads the team in prayer. An Our Father is prayed, and Our Lady of Victory is invoked. The whole team is blessed, and, shortly afterward, they take to the field with a sense of purpose and a perspective that extends beyond football.
While the best-known aspect of the University of Notre Dame is its football team, the school is not devoted to the sport at the expense of its founding principles. The academic and spiritual components of student life are generally seen as superior to, and also helpful for, athletic pursuits.
Success on and off the field are interconnected in South Bend, and most fans remain steadfast in their loyalty to the nation’s best-known Catholic college. Football unites them, but something greater than the game unites them even more.
Father Doyle believes the major unifying principle is tied in with the founding of the school itself.
“It ultimately goes back to the purpose behind the school’s origin — to recognize not just the laws of nature, but the Author of those laws; not just the history of nations, but the Lord of those nations; not just the truths of philosophy, but ultimate Truth Itself,” Father Doyle said. “No one has done this better than Our Lady (translated ‘Notre Dame’ in French), so it is fitting that the school is named after her. The mystique of anything good here in South Bend is inevitably associated with Our Lady.”
Register correspondent Trent Beattie writes from Seattle.


Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/looking-into-the-mystique-of-notre-dame-football?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+NCRegisterDailyBlog+National+Catholic+Register#When:2013-01-4%2006:55:01#ixzz2H1Z8bYpG

Photo of Baby Reaching Out From Womb During C-Section Goes Viral

by Steven Ertelt | Phoenix, AZ | LifeNews.com | 1/2/13 2:10 PM

A new photo of a baby reaching out of the womb and holding a doctor’s finger during a Caesarian section delivery has gone viral and is being passed around Facebook by tens of thousands of people.
A Phoenix-area couple took the picture during the delivery of Nevaeh — Heaven spelled backward — and a local news report says even the physician and hospital nursing staff were surprised by what unfolded.
“It was such an amazing photo. [Hospital staff] had possibly heard of it happening but they had never seen a photo of it,” said Alicia Atkins, Nevaeh’s mother.
Few lives will be as well documented as little Nevaeh’s. Her mother is a professional photographer who owns A Classic Pin-Up in Glendale. However, it was her dad, Randy, who snapped the picture.
“The doctor called me over and said, ‘Hey, she’s grabbing my finger.’ So I ran over there and just grabbed the shot and I was just in awe looking at it. It was such an amazing picture,” said Randy Atkins, adding that he was nervous about missing the precious and fleeting moment as he hurried to snap a picture.
Now, the picture has been liked and shared by thousands and the couple has offers to buy the photo, which they never intended to place online for public viewing.

“I can FINALLY share this!!!!” Alicia said on her Facebook page when posting the photo on December 26. “This was 10 weeks ago when I was having my c-section and
Dr. Sawyer broke my water and my daughter reached up out of my stomach and grabbed the Dr.’s finger and my hubby caught this special moment.”
“Truly amazing. I am in awe of this photo. Something to remember forever,” she adds. “Thank you for helping me deliver 3 of the most amazing wonderful gifts I could ever ask for. A Couple of miracle children. You are truly an amazing Dr. and couldn’t ask for a better one. I had this printed for my OBGYN on a canvas.”

HHS Mandate Blocked for 10 For-Profits

Information courtesy of CRC Public Relations\

The controversial portion of the HHS mandate has been temporarily blocked for 10 of 13 corporations who sued on religious liberty grounds - an indication of the strength of their case. The owners of these corporations include Catholics, Evangelical Christians as well as Mennonites.


Injunctions Granted:

• Korte v. Sebelius – (7th Circuit injunction granted pending appeal)

• O’Brien v. HHS, (8th Circuit injunction granted pending appeal)

• Newland v. Sebelius (Hercules), (D. Colorado, preliminary injunction granted)

• Legatus v. Sebelius, (E.D. Mich., preliminary injunction granted for Weingartz plaintiffs)

• Tyndale Publishers v. Sebelius, (D.D.C., preliminary injunction granted)

• Am. Pulverizer Co. v. HHS (Griesedieck) (W.D. Missouri - preliminary injunction granted)

• Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Sebelius, (E.D. Pa. temporary restraining order granted)

• Domino’s Farms Corp. v. Sebelius, (E.D. Mich., temporary restraining order granted)

• Sharp Holdings, Inc. v. HHS (E.D. Missouri ND., temporary restraining order granted)

• Triune Health Group v. HHS (N.D. Illinois, preliminary injunction granted)

Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., Autocam Corp., and Grote Indus. LLC have been denied an injunction

A Man for All Seasons - the Devil and the Law

Why NOT to jettison the Constitution:
 
 

The Lawless, and Ultimately Pointless, Views of Professor Seidman

 
The twitterverse is abuzz today about Louis Michael Seidman’s New York Times op-ed, “Let’s Give Up on the Constitution,” in which the Georgetown law professor flacks his forthcoming book, On Constitutional Disobedience. I wrote about Seidman and his views a few weeks ago, when the Chronicle of Higher Education ran an interview with him. It was possible that the Chronicle’s writer made Seidman’s arguments come out marginally more incoherent than they really are. But with today’s Times op-ed, which presumably contains the choicest and most powerful points made in the book he is eager to have us read, we have confirmation: This is a stupendously bad argument, almost too idiotic to be understood as seriously intended. (I keep the “almost” because Seidman is a law professor, after all.)
Seidman is frustrated with features of our government, and blames his frustration on the Constitution. Okay. His solution, though, is to urge us to “disobey” the Constitution. But as I noted weeks ago, he does not want us to disobey the entire Constitution–only the parts of it that he doesn’t like. We should obey the parts of the Constitution that we “respect,” and not consider the whole of it as carrying any “obligation.” But which parts of it should we respect? What if I respect certain parts, and Seidman respects different parts? Shall we have a test of strength to see which of us prevails at the polls? Come to think of it, who needs elections? Perhaps the supporters of Mitt Romney might decide they don’t respect the part of the Constitution that resulted in the reelection of President Obama. Professor Seidman’s argument, on its own terms, is quite incapable of answering anyone who acted lawlessly on such a basis. In fact, as I argued weeks ago, his entire argument is an assault on all law, and on the rule of law itself.
Thanks to Seidman’s muddled thinking, it is not even clear what “disobeying” would look like. In a failure of nerve, he concludes his essay by mumbling something about how we should all “make a good-faith effort to understand the views of others.” The conclusion is well-nigh inescapable that Seidman himself has been arguing in bad faith. All this épater la bourgeoisie rhetoric was trotted out to soften up his readers, persuading them to consider relaxing the strictures of the Constitution in ways that suit his purposes. The “living Constitution” school of thought (which Professor Seidman notes in passing without mentioning his own membership therein) began similarly, with the Progressives’ depreciation of the founders and their Constitution, and their clever turn toward “reinterpreting” the Constitution rather than “disobeying” it–which is to say, their turn toward disobeying it while paying lip service to it. This at least had the merit, to borrow from La Rochefoucauld, of being that hypocrisy in which vice pays tribute to virtue.
For someone who has taught constitutional law for 40 years, Seidman employs some terribly potted history, too. Most of his examples of our “long history of disobedience” have to do with people disagreeing over what the Constitution means (even if some of them are hypocrites–see above), and how best to fulfill our obligations to it. But while it is true that our constitutional disagreements regularly feature accusations of “disobedience”–and every overturning of a statute by judicial review entails a finding that the Constitution has been disobeyed–Seidman’s “long history of disobedience” adduces not a single example in which the actors involved thought and said that “disobeying the Constitution” was a good thing.
Seidman’s best example is his first one, and it won’t serve, either. Here it is:
In fact, the Constitution itself was born of constitutional disobedience. When George Washington and the other framers went to Philadelphia in 1787, they were instructed to suggest amendments to the Articles of Confederation, which would have had to be ratified by the legislatures of all 13 states. Instead, in violation of their mandate, they abandoned the Articles, wrote a new Constitution and provided that it would take effect after ratification by only nine states, and by conventions in those states rather than the state legislatures.
This argument for the Constitution’s “unconstitutionality,” not surprisingly, was made at the time. And James Madison, in Federalist No. 40, torpedoed the argument with ease. Readers may consult what I wrote on that essay nearly six years ago in my “Perennial Publius” series here at Bench Memos, but the gist of Madison’s argument was that at bottom the Constitution was a revolutionary displacement of the Articles of Confederation in accordance with a higher principle, not a mere “disobedience” of the Articles.
Compared to the true revolutionaries of our founding, Professor Seidman is a weak sister. If he really thought our Constitution was beyond redemption, he could say so, and follow the revolutionary argument to its real conclusion. What’s really going on here is the final collapse into utter intellectual bankruptcy of the “living Constitution” approach to our fundamental law. Thanks to the pioneering work of the late Robert Bork and other early originalists, and the many who have followed in their path, “living constitutionalism” has been utterly discredited. The result is that the adherents to the latter school have largely fragmented into two groups, those who claim that they too are “originalists” after all (while changing really nothing about their views) and those who have decided simply to attack the Constitution. Neither group, when all is said and done, really has much to say that is of any use.

Let’s Give Up on the Constitution

By
New York Times
AS the nation teeters at the edge of fiscal chaos, observers are reaching the conclusion that the American system of government is broken. But almost no one blames the culprit: our insistence on obedience to the Constitution, with all its archaic, idiosyncratic and downright evil provisions.
Consider, for example, the assertion by the Senate minority leader last week that the House could not take up a plan by Senate Democrats to extend tax cuts on households making $250,000 or less because the Constitution requires that revenue measures originate in the lower chamber. Why should anyone care? Why should a lame-duck House, 27 members of which were defeated for re-election, have a stranglehold on our economy? Why does a grotesquely malapportioned Senate get to decide the nation’s fate?
Our obsession with the Constitution has saddled us with a dysfunctional political system, kept us from debating the merits of divisive issues and inflamed our public discourse. Instead of arguing about what is to be done, we argue about what James Madison might have wanted done 225 years ago.
As someone who has taught constitutional law for almost 40 years, I am ashamed it took me so long to see how bizarre all this is. Imagine that after careful study a government official — say, the president or one of the party leaders in Congress — reaches a considered judgment that a particular course of action is best for the country. Suddenly, someone bursts into the room with new information: a group of white propertied men who have been dead for two centuries, knew nothing of our present situation, acted illegally under existing law and thought it was fine to own slaves might have disagreed with this course of action. Is it even remotely rational that the official should change his or her mind because of this divination?
Constitutional disobedience may seem radical, but it is as old as the Republic. In fact, the Constitution itself was born of constitutional disobedience. When George Washington and the other framers went to Philadelphia in 1787, they were instructed to suggest amendments to the Articles of Confederation, which would have had to be ratified by the legislatures of all 13 states. Instead, in violation of their mandate, they abandoned the Articles, wrote a new Constitution and provided that it would take effect after ratification by only nine states, and by conventions in those states rather than the state legislatures.
No sooner was the Constitution in place than our leaders began ignoring it. John Adams supported the Alien and Sedition Acts, which violated the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech. Thomas Jefferson thought every constitution should expire after a single generation. He believed the most consequential act of his presidency — the purchase of the Louisiana Territory — exceeded his constitutional powers.
Before the Civil War, abolitionists like Wendell Phillips and William Lloyd Garrison conceded that the Constitution protected slavery, but denounced it as a pact with the devil that should be ignored. When Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation — 150 years ago tomorrow — he justified it as a military necessity under his power as commander in chief. Eventually, though, he embraced the freeing of slaves as a central war aim, though nearly everyone conceded that the federal government lacked the constitutional power to disrupt slavery where it already existed. Moreover, when the law finally caught up with the facts on the ground through passage of the 13th Amendment, ratification was achieved in a manner at odds with constitutional requirements. (The Southern states were denied representation in Congress on the theory that they had left the Union, yet their reconstructed legislatures later provided the crucial votes to ratify the amendment.)
In his Constitution Day speech in 1937, Franklin D. Roosevelt professed devotion to the document, but as a statement of aspirations rather than obligations. This reading no doubt contributed to his willingness to extend federal power beyond anything the framers imagined, and to threaten the Supreme Court when it stood in the way of his New Deal legislation. In 1954, when the court decided Brown v. Board of Education, Justice Robert H. Jackson said he was voting for it as a moral and political necessity although he thought it had no basis in the Constitution. The list goes on and on.
The fact that dissenting justices regularly, publicly and vociferously assert that their colleagues have ignored the Constitution — in landmark cases from Miranda v. Arizona to Roe v. Wade to Romer v. Evans to Bush v. Gore — should give us pause. The two main rival interpretive methods, “originalism” (divining the framers’ intent) and “living constitutionalism” (reinterpreting the text in light of modern demands), cannot be reconciled. Some decisions have been grounded in one school of thought, and some in the other. Whichever your philosophy, many of the results — by definition — must be wrong.
IN the face of this long history of disobedience, it is hard to take seriously the claim by the Constitution’s defenders that we would be reduced to a Hobbesian state of nature if we asserted our freedom from this ancient text. Our sometimes flagrant disregard of the Constitution has not produced chaos or totalitarianism; on the contrary, it has helped us to grow and prosper.
This is not to say that we should disobey all constitutional commands. Freedom of speech and religion, equal protection of the laws and protections against governmental deprivation of life, liberty or property are important, whether or not they are in the Constitution. We should continue to follow those requirements out of respect, not obligation.
Nor should we have a debate about, for instance, how long the president’s term should last or whether Congress should consist of two houses. Some matters are better left settled, even if not in exactly the way we favor. Nor, finally, should we have an all-powerful president free to do whatever he wants. Even without constitutional fealty, the president would still be checked by Congress and by the states. There is even something to be said for an elite body like the Supreme Court with the power to impose its views of political morality on the country.
What would change is not the existence of these institutions, but the basis on which they claim legitimacy. The president would have to justify military action against Iran solely on the merits, without shutting down the debate with a claim of unchallengeable constitutional power as commander in chief. Congress might well retain the power of the purse, but this power would have to be defended on contemporary policy grounds, not abstruse constitutional doctrine. The Supreme Court could stop pretending that its decisions protecting same-sex intimacy or limiting affirmative action were rooted in constitutional text.
The deep-seated fear that such disobedience would unravel our social fabric is mere superstition. As we have seen, the country has successfully survived numerous examples of constitutional infidelity. And as we see now, the failure of the Congress and the White House to agree has already destabilized the country. Countries like Britain and New Zealand have systems of parliamentary supremacy and no written constitution, but are held together by longstanding traditions, accepted modes of procedure and engaged citizens. We, too, could draw on these resources.
What has preserved our political stability is not a poetic piece of parchment, but entrenched institutions and habits of thought and, most important, the sense that we are one nation and must work out our differences. No one can predict in detail what our system of government would look like if we freed ourselves from the shackles of constitutional obligation, and I harbor no illusions that any of this will happen soon. But even if we can’t kick our constitutional-law addiction, we can soften the habit.
If we acknowledged what should be obvious — that much constitutional language is broad enough to encompass an almost infinitely wide range of positions — we might have a very different attitude about the obligation to obey. It would become apparent that people who disagree with us about the Constitution are not violating a sacred text or our core commitments. Instead, we are all invoking a common vocabulary to express aspirations that, at the broadest level, everyone can embrace. Of course, that does not mean that people agree at the ground level. If we are not to abandon constitutionalism entirely, then we might at least understand it as a place for discussion, a demand that we make a good-faith effort to understand the views of others, rather than as a tool to force others to give up their moral and political judgments.
If even this change is impossible, perhaps the dream of a country ruled by “We the people” is impossibly utopian. If so, we have to give up on the claim that we are a self-governing people who can settle our disagreements through mature and tolerant debate. But before abandoning our heritage of self-government, we ought to try extricating ourselves from constitutional bondage so that we can give real freedom a chance.

Louis Michael Seidman, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University, is the author of the forthcoming book “On Constitutional Disobedience.”

Thursday, January 3, 2013

Catholic owners of healthcare company win injunction against HHS mandate

by John Jalsevac

CHICAGO, Jan. 3, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The Roman Catholic Owners of an Illinois healthcare management business are celebrating after winning an important first victory in their battle against the Obama administration’s HHS birth control mandate.
Today the Federal District Court in Chicago issued an order temporarily blocking the Obama administration from enforcing the mandate on Triune Health Group and its owners, Christopher and Mary Anne Yep, while litigation continues.

The Yeps are among the dozens of employers around the country challenging the HHS mandate, which requires coverage of contraception, sterilization and abortifacients, on religious liberty grounds. The mandate took effect on Jan. 1 of this year for most employers.
This is the tenth case in which a court has agreed to hand out a preliminary injunction blocking the mandate. In three cases the courts have refused to do so.
“This is a major victory for our clients and for the cause of religious liberty,” said Kevin Edward White, legal counsel for Chicago’s Thomas More Society.
“An oppressive, unconstitutional burden has been temporarily lifted from the shoulders of Christopher and Mary Anne Yep that allows them to continue to practice their Roman Catholic faith and operate their company in a manner that they deem faithful to their conscientious religious beliefs.”
White is representing Triune together with the Sam Casey and Bart Waxman of the Jubilee Campaign’s Law of Life Project.
Casey also welcomed the ruling, saying in a statement, “The federal governments ought not to be able coerce our clients to violate their conscientious convictions in a fashion that is completely at odds with the resounding declarations of our Founding Fathers and our modern Supreme Court jurisprudence.”
The lawyer praised the Yeps for “taking a stand to defend their right to run their business in a way that does not conflict with their faith and religious free conscience.”
In Triune’s request for a preliminary injunction, the Yeps had urged the court to grant them relief lest they face the choice either “to comply with the federal mandate’s requirements in violation of their religious beliefs, or pay ruinous fines that would have a crippling impact on their business and force them to shut down.”
There are nearly 50 lawsuits against the mandate pending in federal courts across the country.
The most recent polling data from December 2012 shows Americans support a religious exemption to the HHS contraceptive mandate for individuals and organizations like the Yeps and Triune.
Triune was recently named by Crain’s Chicago Business as the Best Place to Work for Women in the Chicago metro area.

Hobby Lobby Defies Obama Administration with Civil Disobedience for Religious Liberty

 

28 Dec 2012
Breitbart

“We must obey God rather than men!”—Acts 5:29.

Now that Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has denied Hobby Lobby’s application for an emergency injunction protecting them from Obamacare’s HHS Mandate on abortion and birth control, Hobby Lobby has decided to defy the federal government to remain true to their religious beliefs, at enormous risk and financial cost.
Hobby Lobby is wholly owned and controlled by the Green family, who are evangelical Christians. The Greens are committed to running their business in accordance with their Christian faith, believing that God wants them to conduct their professional business in accordance with the family’s understanding of the Bible. Hobby Lobby’s mission statement includes, “Honoring the Lord in all we do by operating the company … consistent with Biblical principles.”
The HHS Mandate goes into effect for Hobby Lobby on Jan. 1, 2013. The Greens correctly understand that some of the drugs the HHS Mandate requires them to cover at no cost in their healthcare plans cause abortions.
Today Hobby Lobby announced that they will not comply with this mandate to become complicit in abortion, which the Greens believe ends an innocent human life. Given Hobby Lobby’s size (it has 572 stores employing more than 13,000 people), by violating the HHS Mandate, it will be subject to over $1.3 million in fines per day. That means over $40 million in fines in January alone. If their case takes another ten months to get before the Supreme Court—which would be the earliest it could get there under the normal order of business—the company would incur almost a half-billion dollars in fines. And then of course the Supreme Court would have to write an opinion in what would likely be a split decision with dissenters, which could easily take four or six months and include hundreds of millions of dollars in additional penalties.
This is civil disobedience, consistent with America’s highest traditions when moral issues are at stake. The Greens are a law-abiding family. They have no desire to defy their own government. But as the Founders launched the American Revolution because they believed the British government was violating their rights, the Greens believe that President Barack Obama and Secretary Kathleen Sebelius are commanding the Greens to sin against God, and that no government has the lawful authority to do so.
The Christian tradition of defying government commands to do something wrong goes back to the very birth of Christianity. When the apostles were ordered not to share the gospel of Jesus Christ with anyone, the Book of Acts records: “Peter and the other apostles replied: ‘We must obey God rather than men! The God of our fathers raised Jesus from the dead—whom you had killed by hanging him on a tree.’”
Eleven of the twelve apostles—including Peter—would lose their lives for the sake of spreading the gospel of Jesus Christ; only the apostle John died of old age. They were determined to obey God’s will at all costs.
This issue of civil disobedience is never to be undertaken lightly. The Bible teaches Christians to submit to all legitimate governmental authority (e.g., Romans 13:1), and so a person can only disobey the government when there is no other way to obey God.
But here in America, the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, and in its First Amendment it protects against a government establishment of an official religion and separately protects the free exercise of religion. On top of that, Congress passed the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA) to specifically add an additional layer of protection against government actions that violate a person’s religious beliefs.
The HHS Mandate is a gross violation of the religious beliefs of the Green family. The issue before the courts here is whether the Greens religious-liberty rights include running their secular, for-profit business consistent with their religious beliefs. In other words, is religious liberty just what you do in church on a Sunday morning, or does it include what you do during the week at your job?
The Greens are now putting their fortunes on the line to do what they believe is right. The courts should side with them, affirming a broad scope of religious liberty under the Constitution and RFRA. And the Supreme Court should resolve this matter with dispatch in their favor.
Millions of Christians across the country feel exactly the same way as the Greens. The Obama administration has issued a statist command that is a declaration of war on people of faith who object to abortion, and civil disobedience could break out all over the country unless the courts set this matter right—and quickly.
Breitbart News legal columnist Ken Klukowski is on faculty at Liberty University School of Law.

Today on the Countdown

Today on the Countdown of the Best interviews of 2012

4:00 - #7 - Bishops Were Not Invited to White House HHS Discussions
Despite the President’s “compromise” on the government’s assault on religious liberty, the White House has not offered any concessions to the U.S. bishops’ conference and NEVER contacted them about possible negotiations. Bishop William Lori of Bridgeport, Conn., said “no one from the administration has approached the United States Catholic Conference of Bishops for discussions on this matter of a possible ‘compromise.’” Bishop Lori joins us.

4:20 - #6 - Lincoln: The Movie, the Man and the 13th Amendment
The film critics and theater-goers everywhere have overwhelmingly given their collective “thumbs up” to the film “Lincoln” which focuses its scope to the fight over the 13th Amendment. But what about the Lincoln scholars? Ronald White Jr. is the author of numerous books on Lincoln and joins us to give his perspective.

5:00 – #5 - Kresta Comments: The Newtown Massacre

5:20 – #4 - The Cause for Canonization Moves Forward for the Now-Venerable Fulton Sheen
Archbishop Fulton Sheen took a significant step toward sainthood earlier this year when he was declared "venerable" by Pope Benedict XVI. The declaration is the second step toward sainthood for Sheen, named a "servant of God" by Pope John Paul II in 2002. The Vatican already has launched its investigation of a reported miracle at a Peoria hospital that, if authenticated by the church, would elevate Sheen to just one more miracle away from sainthood. Here at the USCCB Conference in Baltimore we talk to Msgr. Stanley Deptula about the life of the now-Venerable Fulton Sheen.

Mennonite Company Wins HHS Injunction

Lancaster Intelligencer Journal

By BRIAN WALLACE

An East Earl-based cabinetmaker that sued the federal government, alleging the Affordable Care Act violates its constitutional rights, has won a two-week reprieve from complying with the law.

Conestoga Wood Specialties in December sued the U.S. secretaries of labor, health and human services and the treasury, alleging it would be "sinful and immoral" to make the company comply with the law by paying for or supporting contraception.

The company's owners, who are Mennonites, objected to the mandate that they provide health insurance that covers birth-control products such as Plan B, the "morning after" pill.

U.S. District Judge Mitchell Goldberg last week imposed a temporary stay, effective Jan. 1, giving the company a two-week reprieve from complying with the law while the case proceeds through his court.

Companies that refuse to follow the law face fines of up to $100 a day per employee -- about $95,000 a day for Conestoga Wood Specialties.

Attorneys for the company and the federal government are scheduled to return to court Friday to argue the case.

Chuck Proctor, an attorney representing Conestoga Wood Specialties, said he expects a preliminary ruling on the case sometime next week.

His client's lawsuit is one of about 40 that have been filed across the country by companies and other employers objecting to the contraception provisions of the Affordable Care Act, Proctor said.

VIDEO: Aussie father of 7 released from prison after 8 months served for pro-life activism

 
BRISBANE, December 20, 2012, (LifeSiteNews.com) – In prison since April, Graham Preston a father of seven children is home just in time to celebrate Christmas with his family. LifeSiteNews.com was there to share his happy return.
Preston was jailed for refusing to pay roughly $8,000 in fines that have accumulated after 10 years of non-violently blocking the entrances of four abortion clinics around Brisbane.
Since beginning non-violent direct action with the group Protect Life a decade ago, Preston has endured more than 18 months in jail over six separate jail-terms, mostly in Brisbane’s maximum security Arthur Gorrie Correctional Centre.
At the time of his latest incarceration Mr. Preston’s wife, Liz, told LifeSiteNews.com that she was extremely proud of her husband.
“I have immense respect for Graham,” she said. “He is a very courageous person who has my full support in these actions. Facing the prospect of having Graham in jail for eight months is quite daunting. However, we have always realized that challenging the abortion culture would be costly and we have tried to not allow the potential cost prevent us from doing what we believe is right.”
Graham’s daughter Frances, 18, said, “I have a lot of respect for my dad and how he takes his convictions seriously. I hope I can live as consistent a life as his. Of course, I will miss him, and I will visit him as often as possible.”
Daughter Suzannah, eight, said, “I will miss him every day until he comes home in December, five days before Christmas. I will pray for him every night.”

Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Senegalese Catholic Helps Women Get Education to Beat Poverty

By James Martone
Source: Catholic News Service
Published: Tuesday, January 01, 2013
Senegalese aid worker Constance Mbaye sits with children Dec. 11 in the village of Dialamakhan, Senegal.

TAMBACOUNDA, Senegal (CNS) — When she heard from the village chief that a 14-year-old girl was being forced to leave school and marry, Senegalese aid worker Constance Mbaye could think of only one thing to do.
"I gave the chief my telephone number and address and told him to tell the girl that if she could escape and make it to the city, I would take care of her," said Mbaye, a Catholic who once thought she wanted to be a nun.
She said the girl, Idiatou, fled her tiny village the same evening, walked five miles in the dark through forests and fields to the nearest road, then hitched a ride to Tambacounda, where she showed up in front of Mbaye's house the next morning.
The event in 2007 marked the beginning of Femmes Entr'Aide, the charity Mbaye founded to help Idiatou and others like her study amid great obstacles in rural Senegal, where a 2012 UNESCO report shows 94 percent of women ages 15-24 have less than a lower secondary education.
"They get married early, or their parents don't have the means to pay for school, or it is far and they can't get there," Mbaye told Catholic News Service in mid-December.
"I grew up in the (Catholic) church and learned to help others when I can," said Mbaye. "I consider that my efforts to educate young women are part of what Jesus meant when he told us to love each other."
This lack of educated young women in Senegal contributes to the country's lack of development, said Mbaye, who has worked for nearly 30 years on various aid projects across this West African nation of 13 million people.
"Yes, we can teach older illiterate women to read and write, but often they don't have the time and are too busy with chores to go to classes. So I understood long ago that we have to start early and at the basic level ... so it is imperative to get families to send their girls to school," said Mbaye.
After Idiatou showed up at her house, Mbaye said she sought and received money from French and American donors to start her charity and build a hostel in Tambacounda for young women from Senegal's rural villages. In the countryside, a blend of poverty, illiteracy, traditions and absence of secondary schools keeps girls homebound to work and wed — sometimes at as early as age 11 — despite Senegalese law that states the minimum marriage age is 20 for males and 16 for females.
"One time there was an 11-year-old girl that was engaged to be married," Mbaye recalled, "and I complained to the village chief, who told me, 'You want every girl in the village to go to school? Take half, but leave half.'"
Mbaye said the safe and free-of-charge hostel encourages parents to let their young women leave their villages to study in Tambacounda's public schools, as does the stipend that covers school materials and daily meals.
Since opening its doors in 2008, Femmes Entr'Aide — French for "Women Aiding Each Other" — has helped 552 young women attend classes beyond the elementary level, according to the charity's records.
Mbaye spoke of a shortage of funds, noting that a recently fired employee was in jail for swindling thousands in hostel funds.
"We have had to cut back on cooks and cleaners, and the amount of the stipend has decreased. We are looking at ways of making the hostel more sustainable," she said.
When not at school or studying, the young women take turns cooking and cleaning, and there are plans to build a reservoir to save on water bills, as well as plans for a boutique to sell soap the women will make to help defray living costs.
Mbaye said that of the 131 students now living in the hostel, 35 are young men residing in a separate wing, and 59 male students have received assistance from her organization since 2010.
"Villagers get afraid (of educating their young women) and ask, 'If we send the girls what will happen to the boys? Who will they find to marry?' I say let's send everyone to school," said Mbaye.
She said her organization recently used funding from the Catholic charity Caritas in the Diocese of St. Polten, Austria, to construct classrooms for both young men and women in Thies, her hometown.
She said her paying job as a coordinator for a government rural energy project means she is often in the field in remote parts of the country, giving her vital access to village parents and the opportunity to advocate for their children's education.
"I don't tell (parents) they are wrong, this is not my approach. I explain to them the negative consequences of not sending their young to school and the effects this will have in the future" such as increased illiteracy and poverty, Mbaye said.
Idiatou, the catalyst behind Femmes Entr'Aide, is now 18. At the time of her escape, Mbaye insisted on meeting the girl's illiterate parents to convince them they'd be better off with a daughter who was educated. The parents consented, but married Idiatou to a neighbor's son on the second day of her first school break, when she was home for a visit.
"Then I went back to the village and convinced the husband to allow his new wife to continue her studies in Tambacounda," said Mbaye. "He was immigrating ... and I explained how useful it would be if his wife was educated ... in order to look after their future children's health and read important notices" while he was away, Mbaye explained.
Mbaye said that, soon after the wedding, the husband left for Spain and has not returned.
Idiatou, in the meantime, has finished high school in Tambacounda and is now in her second year of studies at a nursing college, Mbaye added.


The Economics of Witness

Missouri Federal Court Issues TRO In Contraceptive Mandate Case, Invoking 1st Amendment As Well As RFRA

Tuesday, January 1, 2013
Religion Clause

In Sharpe Holdings, Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, (ED MO, Dec. 31, 2012), a Missouri federal magistrate judge issued a temporary restraining order barring enforcement of the Affordable Care Act contraceptive coverage mandate to require a for-profit dairy farming and cheese making business to cover abortifacient devices ( Plan B, Ella and copper IUDs) and related counseling. In addition to the company, plaintiffs in the case were Charles Sharpe, the founder-owner and CEO of the company, and two employees who "pay a portion of the required premiums and enjoy the benefits of the self-insured program." In addition to concluding that under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act the mandate and its penalties would substantially burden plaintiffs' free exercise rights, the court held that for 1st Amendment purposes, the mandate is not a neutral law of general applicability:
Plaintiffs have shown to the court’s satisfaction for the purposes of these initial proceedings, that the ACA mandate is not generally applicable because it does not apply to grandfathered health plans, religious employers, or employers with fewer than fifty employees. Specifically, plaintiffs argue that the ACA mandate’s exemptions clearly prefer secular purposes over religious purposes and some religious purposes over other religious purposes. Burdens cannot be selectively imposed only on conduct motivated by religious belief.
 
My Photo
 
by Howard Friedman, Professor of Law Emeritus University of Toledo. Now residing in Atlanta, Georgia area.

Top Religion Story of 2012


 December 28, 2012
www.catholicleague.org
Bill Donohue comments as follows:

The top religion story of 2012 was The Chronicle of Philanthropy survey of American charitable giving, “How America Gives”; it was released in August. Its central finding was that the more religious a city or state is, the more charitable it is; conversely, the more secular an area is, the more miserly the people are.


The most generous states are Utah and Idaho, both of which have a high number of Mormon residents; the Bible Belt states account for all the other states in the top ten. With regard to cities, Salt Lake City and Memphis are one-two. The least generous states, ranked 45-50, are Connecticut, Rhode Island, Massachusetts, Vermont, Maine and New Hampshire. The two stingiest cities are Boston and Providence.

The findings are consistent with other studies. It suggests that the rise of the “nones”—those who have no religious affiliation—are a social liability for the nation. It also shows that those who live in the most liberal areas of the nation are precisely the ones who do the least to combat poverty. They talk a good game—liberals are always screaming about the horrors of poverty—but in the end they find it difficult to open their wallets.

There is little doubt that the “nones” and liberals (there is a lot of overlap) are living off the social capital of the most religious persons in the nation. Perhaps there is some way this can be reflected in the tax code.


Contact our director of communications about Donohue’s remarks:
Jeff Field
Phone: 212-371-3191
E-mail: cl@catholicleague.org

Continuing the Countdown...

Today as we crack the top 10

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 2

4:00 – #10 - Lance Armstrong's former friend speaks out about athlete's use of performance enhancing drugs
For some of those who knew Lance Armstrong the best, his fall from grace amid doping allegations is no surprise at all. Betsy Andreu, a former family friend to Armstrong says Armstrong is the “Bernie Madoff” of the sporting world. Andreu says Armstrong played the world and the media for years while knowingly taking performance enhancing drugs. Betsy joins us to discuss how she and Armstrong had a falling out when she refused to lie about something she heard while visiting Armstrong in the hospital at the time he was diagnosed with testicular cancer.

5:00 – #9 - Vatican Demands Reform of Leadership Conference of Women Religious
The Vatican has called for a thorough reform of the Leadership Conference of Women Religious (LCWR), the umbrella group that represents most of the women’s religious orders in the US. After a thorough investigation of the LCWR, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) concluded that “the current doctrinal and pastoral situation of LCWR is grave and a matter of serious concern.” The CDF concluded that a Vatican intervention was necessary to reform the group. Archbishop Peter Sartain of Seattle has been appointed as the Vatican’s delegate to supervise the reform of the LCWR. The archbishop has been charged with helping LCWR leaders to revise the group’s statues, plan its programs, review liturgical texts, and reconsider the group’s affiliations with other organizations. We talk with Sr. Johannah Paruch, a member of the Sisters of St. Francis of the Martyr St. George.

5:40 – #8 - The “New Eugenics”
The news that scientists can test a fetus’s genome through non-invasive means presents a crucial challenge to the moral integrity of society. Will these tests be used by parents and doctors to help prepare the family for a potentially special-needs child? Or instead, will this science accelerate the ongoing search and destroy mission to eugenically cleanse our progeny? We talk to bioethicist Wesley Smith about the “new eugenics.”

Orphan’s New Year’s Resolution: Build a House for Other Orphans

by on Dec 31, 2012
Catholic Lane
L-R Calvin, Evan Beauchamp, Joash (high school graduation)
Calvin (far right) with his
brothers, Rogers and Joash
Imagine a Kenyan AIDS orphan living in a mud hut with his two brothers and walking several miles to school on an empty stomach. After the devastating loss of both of his parents, facing daily grinding poverty, would he have any energy left to dream of a better future? This boy is not imaginary; his name is Calvin and I know him well because during his adolescence, he read a novel about a Kenyan boy who went to school in the United States. Even though the story was fiction, it planted a dream in Calvin. It seemed an impossible dream for a boy with only two pants to his name and suffering from malnutrition, but faith is a wonderful thing. Calvin prayed that one day he would go to school in the United States. When his brother and aunt laughed and suggested praying for something more realistic, Calvin was undaunted.
 
Never mind that he had never met an American and had no money, God could do anything, could he not? Our family friend Evan Beauchamp became a missionary with our Bismarck, ND diocesan Kenyan mission, a charitable cause begun in 1992. He came to teach English at the school Calvin attended. Calvin brightened; could this be his chance? He asked Evan to take him back to the U.S. with him, but Evan was 68, too old for such a commitment. Besides, Evan stayed in Kenya for another 9 years. (He passed away from cancer in 2011 at the age of 78.)
 
After much pleading and prayers, Evan agreed to ask his friends in Bismarck. To make a long story short, after many seemingly insurmountable odds were overcome, Calvin joined our family, nine years ago. Two other families helped make that possible by helping with his support. His younger brother Joash joined us two years later. Joash now attends a university on a full athletic (track) scholarship.
Joash, Calvin, Rogers in Kenya before Calvin came to the US
Calvin had another dream. He wanted to become a doctor and return to Kenya to help the poor. Initially, it seemed so impossible and even arrogant to tell people of this hope. But he prayed. This month, Calvin completed the basic sciences part of medical school. He is visiting his older brother and family in Kenya before beginning an internship in the United States in February. While there, another dream was born in Calvin’s heart: to build a house for some abandoned AIDS orphans. Here is an excerpt from Calvin’s Christmas email, which explains everything.
As we approach the end of another wonderful year and celebrate the birth of our Lord Jesus Christ, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you all for all the prayers and support you gave me this year.
I am in Kenya visiting family and renewing my visa to enable me to start my clinical rotations in the US in February. Initially I was going to do clinical rotation in Aga Khan Hospital in Nairobi, one of the best hospitals in Africa. However, the school refused to allow me to do that rotation because I had not had any clinical rotations yet. So, last week I started volunteering at an AIDS clinic in Oyugis (a town 15 KM from my home). It is very sad working with this patient population. Most of them are younger than 25. There are a lot of kids who contracted this deadly disease from their mothers, and due to their mother’s ignorance, they did not receive medication (Nevirapine) early enough to help decrease the chances of them seroconverting. The brighter side of this whole situation is the fact that most of these patients have a positive attitude. Unlike back in the day when my parents had AIDS, the treatment of AIDS is now readily available.
A few days ago I met 2 orphans near our house in Raganga. Their story is pretty similar to my family’s. The parents passed away from AIDS, the relatives promised to take care of them but after a little while, they kicked them out. The oldest sibling recently dropped out of school in 7th grade and left home to go herd cattle to make money to support his little siblings. The two younger ones, (5th and 3rd grade) that I met are still living at home, getting some help from grandparents and also depending on other people to help them with food, clothing, etc.. Rogers [Calvin’s older brother] has also been doing what he can to help. They are not within the region where the Bismarck Diocese operates and thus do not receive help from them. The house they are living in should, in fact, not be considered a house. The roof is leaky, thus letting water in the house. This is a big problem in this region of Kisii, where we receive a lot of rain. As far as school is concerned, they are attending a public school that I did attend for a year after my parents passed. My brother Joash did most of his primary schooling there. I can attribute most of the struggles that Joash had when he first moved to the US to the poor education offered at this school.
The main reason I am writing about these three orphans is that they need a chance in life. A 7th grader dropping out of school to go herd cattle so his little siblings can go to school is not ok. Yet, in Kenya and all over Africa, older siblings are making this decision daily. The older sisters are choosing prostitution, and the older brothers are choosing herding cattle and gang life to make sure their little siblings have a better life. Through your prayers and contributions, we can help just this one family. Building a tin roofed house for them will cost $500 and tuition in a good school for an entire year is $500. I know a $1000 is a lot of money. But I think we should focus on the house first.
Sorry for the long email. Have a Merry Christmas and a blessed New Year.
We all know that this family is just one of so many others that need help in Kenya, and even in our world. But I know the blessings that came from accepting Calvin and Joash into our family, and we want to continue this journey of love. God does not ask us to save the whole world, but he does ask us to do something: “The king will answer them, ‘I tell all of you with certainty, since you did it for one of the least important of these brothers of mine, you did it for me.’ “ (Matthew 25:40).
 
Our family. Tyler, far left, and Luke, far right,
 will be going to Kenya next month.
Two of my other sons will be vising Calvin in Kenya for the first time in January. They have caught Calvin’s dream and want to help their beloved brother build a house for this family of AIDs orphans who remind Calvin so much of the plight he and his own brothers were in not many years ago.
Listen Live: To hear Calvin, Luke, Tyler, and Joash talk about the project, their upcoming trip to Kenya, and general family fun, tune in to KFYR Radio, Friday, Dec. 28 from 3-4 Central time at www.KFYR.com for live streaming. It can be heard worldwide on the I-Heart App and downloaded for all smartphones.
Can you help my three boys with their New Year’s resolution? It would only cost $500 to build a home, but in Kisii, Kenya, that is a veritable fortune. Then, there is the second goal of another $500 for school tuition.
If you want to help get the house built and enroll those kids in school, we welcome your donations, however small. Calvin is asking for the school to grant one scholarship while he works at raising money for the other one. Any amount will be gratefully accepted. If we should have the happy situation of more than needed, it will all go for the care of AIDS orphans through the Bismarck Diocesan Mission.
Please send your tax-deductible donations to: Bismarck African Mission; 520 North Washington Street; Bismarck, ND 58502-1137 or donate securely online at the diocesan website (click general donation where it asks for parish info). ***Be sure to include a note with your mailed donations, or use the comment box online to specify that the donation is for the AIDS Orphan House Project.***
Donors and Catholic Lane readers who would like to be updated on the progress of this project should send an email to pattiarmstrong(at)mac(dot)com with the subject line “AIDS Orphan House”. I will personally let you know when updates about this project, with new photos, are posted.
Thank you and Happy New Year to you and your family.
 
Patti Maguire Armstrong is a speaker, Catholic author and winner of the 2011 About.com “Reader’s Choice Award”. Her latest books Big Hearted Families, (Scepter Publishers) and children’s book, “Dear God I Don’t Get It” (Liguori Publications) will be released in Spring 2013. Visit Patti’s blog and website. Follow her on on Twitter or Facebook, or find her at her author pages for GPS Guide to Heaven and Earth Homeschool Heart, Stories for the Homeschool Heart, and Big Hearted Families.

Tuesday, January 1, 2013

Federal Judge Grants Tom Monaghan Emergency Request; Halts Government Enforcement of HHS Mandate

Thomas More Law Center

ANN ARBOR, MI – The Thomas More Law Center (TMLC), a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, announced that yesterday (12/30/12) Federal District Court Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff of the Eastern District of Michigan, granted its Emergency Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order of the HHS Mandate. The motion was filed on behalf of Tom Monaghan.

Judge Zatkoff’s ruling effectively halts enforcement of the HHS mandate against Monaghan and his property management company, Domino’s Farms Corporation of which he is the owner and sole shareholder. Domino’s Farms Corporation manages an Office Complex owned by Monaghan and is not to be confused with Domino’s Pizza. Monaghan sold the Pizza company in 1998 and has no active affiliation with it at this time.

The HHS mandate refers to regulations adopted by the Department of Health and Human Services that forces employers, regardless of their religious convictions, to provide insurance coverage for abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization, and contraception under threat of heavy penalties.

Click here to read Judge Zatkoff’s entire opinion.

Erin Mersino, TMLC’s lead counsel on the case filed the original complaint for Declaratory Judgment and Injunctive relief on December 14, 2012. On December 21, 2012, Mersino filed the Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order.

Judge Zatkoff issued his ruling amid a flurry of briefs and supplemental pleadings over the Christmas Holiday between Erin Mersino and the Government’s attorney. The need for quick resolution was clear—on January 1, 2013, Tom Monaghan would be forced to choose between violating his religious beliefs and violating federal law.

For purposes of the emergency Motion, Judge Zatkoff focused only on the claim brought under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. He held he did not need to engage in a separate discussion of Plaintiffs’ Constitutional right to the Free Exercise of Religion since both theories seek to protect the same liberty interest—the free practice of one’s religion.

The Government is expected to appeal Judge Zatkoff’s ruling.

Deficit 'fiscal cliff' bill actually spends $330 billion more

The Washington Times

The "fiscal cliff" deal that was designed to save money actually includes $330.3 billion in new spending over the next decade, according to the official estimate the Congressional Budget Office released Tuesday afternoon.

CBO said the bill contains about $25.1 billion in new cuts, but those are swamped by the new spending on extended unemployment benefits for the long-term jobless and other new refundable tax credits that President Obama fought for.

Of those cuts, only $2 billion are scheduled to take effect in 2013.

And CBO also warned that some of the cuts Congress is counting are from programs on which CBO never expected the money to be spent anyway — such as cuts to the Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan, which was part of Mr. Obama's health care law.

All told, the bill deepens the deficit by nearly $4 trillion over the next decade, when the new tax cuts and spending are combined.

The bill also delays by two months the automatic spending cuts slated to take effect Wednesday, with a promise to reduce spending in the future to cover for them.

Top 10 Starts Tomorrow...

So far this week om the countdown of the best interviews of 2012. Stay tuned tomorrow as we crack the top 10.

MONDAY, DECEMBER 31

#15 - Abandoned: The Untold Story of the Abortion Wars

Every day, thousands of children fragile, innocent, alone are abandoned. They are brutally snuffed from the world and literally left in the trash . . . and it's all legal. Since 1976, Monica Miller has made it her life's work to defend the unborn: she has counseled pregnant women outside of abortion clinics and organized pro-life groups and sit-ins at many of those same clinics. She has blocked abortionists cars, been arrested, and gone to jail. And she has pulled the bodies of thousands of unborn babies out of dumpsters and given them a proper burial. Monica is here to tell the true-life tale of life and death, and a plea for the protection of the most helpless and innocent members of the human family.

#13 - Sex au Naturel: What It Is and Why It's Good for Your Marriage
Sex Au Naturel: What It Is and Why It s Good For Your Marriage by Catholic Answers host Patrick Coffin is a bracing ride across the landscape of the Catholic sexual ethic. If you re looking for intellectual ammo with which to defend and explain the teaching of Humanae Vitae, or if you reject it altogether, you’ll agree that Coffin approaches the topic from a wide array of new and persuasive angles. Patrick joins us.


TUESDAY, JANUARY 1

#13 – Debating Same-Sex Marriage
Polls and election results show Americans sharply divided on same-sex “marriage,” and the controversy is unlikely to subside anytime soon. Taking a "point/counterpoint" approach, John Corvino (a philosopher and prominent gay advocate) and Maggie Gallagher (a nationally syndicated columnist and co-founder of the National Organization for Marriage) explore fundamental questions: What is marriage for? Is sexual difference essential to it? Why does the government sanction it? What are the implications of same-sex marriage for children's welfare, for religious freedom, and for our understanding of marriage itself? We host a debate.

#12 - Kresta Comments: Controversial Michigan Pastor with Bizarre Notions of Hell Leaves Megachurch

A western Michigan pastor who has drawn thousands to Sunday services and written a controversial book about hell has said good-bye to his congregation. He is leaving Mars Hills Bible Church in Grandville and heading to Los Angeles to work on a TV drama based loosely on his life. Bell is the author of "Love Wins," which questions traditional Christian beliefs about hell. Al comments on his view of hell.

#11 - Blind Spot: When Journalists Don’t Get Religion
Why do the media so often miss or misunderstand major news stories? One reason is that, in today's complex and pervasively religious world, understanding religion is vital in accurately reporting and interpreting current events. Paul Marshall is here to discuss how, all too frequently, journalists and commentators do not take religion seriously and therefore fail to grasp the religious context of the news. These examples range from the 2004 U.S. presidential elections, to Iran, Iraq, the papal succession and most notably the nature of Islam.